migrate the original podcasts to mp3
This commit is contained in:
parent
aa3c823f13
commit
1f93d13def
|
|
@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ title: "Substance in the Categories"
|
|||
date: 2020-03-16T23:17:24Z
|
||||
series: "Aristotle 101"
|
||||
image: img/1295493-1584316847837-1cb6263a14ead.jpg
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-03-16_300800f3e7dcf7e496c3a27864bd1d6f.m4a
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-03-16_300800f3e7dcf7e496c3a27864bd1d6f.mp3
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-03-16_300800f3e7dcf7e496c3a27864bd1d6f.m4a" >}}
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-03-16_300800f3e7dcf7e496c3a27864bd1d6f.mp3" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
Transcript can be{{< reltab title="found here." url="post/aristotle-101-substance-in-the-categories/" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ title: "The Four Causes"
|
|||
date: 2020-02-27T23:20:28Z
|
||||
series: "Aristotle 101"
|
||||
image: img/1295493-1582845588348-450f41e79954b.jpg
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-27_8cec687245f86d0ab10bbe975c356f09.m4a
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-27_8cec687245f86d0ab10bbe975c356f09.mp3
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-27_8cec687245f86d0ab10bbe975c356f09.m4a" >}}
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-27_8cec687245f86d0ab10bbe975c356f09.mp3" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
Transcript can be {{< reltab url="post/aristotle-101-the-four-causes/" title="found here." >}}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ title: "Cultural Knowledge and Discipline"
|
|||
date: 2019-06-30T23:39:02Z
|
||||
series: "1. Main Feed"
|
||||
image: img/1295493-1561921958208-fd22b2408cfb.jpg
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-17_5d73a5c13752bfa50890b8854fe2269d.m4a
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-17_5d73a5c13752bfa50890b8854fe2269d.mp3
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-17_5d73a5c13752bfa50890b8854fe2269d.m4a" >}}
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-17_5d73a5c13752bfa50890b8854fe2269d.mp3" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
We're being robbed of our capacity for expression in more ways than just overt censorship. In the name of "liberation" from an ostensible "oppression" we are stripped of access to our cultural heritage, and denied the opportunity to learn the rules and principles that governed the creation of new art in previous generations. This is dangerous, and we ought to reject this.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ title: "Interview: John Holroyd, Judging Religion"
|
|||
date: 2019-11-10T23:29:54Z
|
||||
series: "1. Main Feed"
|
||||
image: img/1295493-1573424704372-82de3d61ca406.jpg
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-28_f8d982f11c04cf7105a0ec21597da316.m4a
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-28_f8d982f11c04cf7105a0ec21597da316.mp3
|
||||
draft: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-28_f8d982f11c04cf7105a0ec21597da316.m4a" >}}
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-28_f8d982f11c04cf7105a0ec21597da316.mp3" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
There is good reason why some people don’t want to talk about religion in polite company. Like conversations about politics, discussions about religion all too often set people at odds with each other in ways that are hard to predict and difficult to control.
|
||||
For all the controversy involved with such debate, this book invites the reader to engage with an ethical appraisal of religion(s) as they are practised today. It is written in the belief that this is an important dialogue for our time. It claims, despite the emotive character of the subject, that the free exchange of ideas and experience between people of differing views and commitments can with practice generate more light than heat.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ title: "Schopenhauer and the Freedom of the Will"
|
|||
date: 2019-03-17T23:52:53Z
|
||||
series: "1. Main Feed"
|
||||
image: img/1295493-1552858652749-f9ba6e217d75c.jpg
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-15_119b0ae00c253dcd57b1e52f89879a9c.m4a
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-15_119b0ae00c253dcd57b1e52f89879a9c.mp3
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-15_119b0ae00c253dcd57b1e52f89879a9c.m4a" >}}
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-15_119b0ae00c253dcd57b1e52f89879a9c.mp3" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
You can find the {{< reltab url="post/artur-schopenhauer-on-freedom/" title="transcript here." >}} For those interested in the original text out of which this dialogue was constructed, you can {{< abstab url="https://www.amazon.com/Freedom-Philosophical-Classics-Norwegian-Sciences/dp/0486440117" title="find it here." >}} I highly recommend giving it a read, when you have some time. I'm a defender of free will, but Schopenhauer makes a defense of determinism here, that every libertarian must answer.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3,10 +3,10 @@ title: "Terrorism, Power, and the Example of Christ"
|
|||
date: 2019-03-31T23:49:22Z
|
||||
series: "1. Main Feed"
|
||||
image: img/1295493-1554023963100-371fceee072eb.jpg
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-15_ec2e429cc1ec06e965e509426bb3d836.m4a
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-15_ec2e429cc1ec06e965e509426bb3d836.mp3
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-15_ec2e429cc1ec06e965e509426bb3d836.m4a" >}}
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-15_ec2e429cc1ec06e965e509426bb3d836.mp3" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
The transcript for this episode can be found in {{< reltab url="post/terror-responsibility-and-the-example-of-god/" title="this blog post." >}} I should probably put a warning on this podcast, because I discuss the Brenton Tarrant terror attack. But, I trust my audience to be able to handle it. So, take what you will from what I have to say.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3,13 +3,13 @@ title: "The First Question: Is There a God?"
|
|||
date: 2020-02-21T23:23:34Z
|
||||
series: "1. Main Feed"
|
||||
image: img/1295493-1582324187131-b1ae37a7ec12d.jpg
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-21_3714fa981ba37d0f6f8a2478612bd2c6.m4a
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-21_3714fa981ba37d0f6f8a2478612bd2c6.mp3
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-21_3714fa981ba37d0f6f8a2478612bd2c6.m4a" >}}
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-21_3714fa981ba37d0f6f8a2478612bd2c6.mp3" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
Transcript can be{{< reltab title="found here." url="post/is-there-a-god/" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
> This post is my first foray into the question of whether or not there is a God. Before I can begin to attempt an answer, I need to explore a deeper question. Namely, what is the nature of this question? What exactly are we asking, when we ask this question? I want to suggest that this question is best understood as a fundamental choice, and that the choice is not simply one of satisfying an ontological preference, but one of universal significance. The way one answers this question will define one’s entire life, indeed all life. It will condition the content of all of one’s relationships, and predispose the outcome of every subsequent choice. It will frame every subsequent question you will ask yourself, from the nature of morality and history, to the kinds of activities you engage in, day to day. This choice lies at the center of everything it means to exist, and to be human. Which fork of the dilemma you choose, is therefore, the most important choice you will ever make.
|
||||
This post is my first foray into the question of whether or not there is a God. Before I can begin to attempt an answer, I need to explore a deeper question. Namely, what is the nature of this question? What exactly are we asking, when we ask this question? I want to suggest that this question is best understood as a fundamental choice, and that the choice is not simply one of satisfying an ontological preference, but one of universal significance. The way one answers this question will define one’s entire life, indeed all life. It will condition the content of all of one’s relationships, and predispose the outcome of every subsequent choice. It will frame every subsequent question you will ask yourself, from the nature of morality and history, to the kinds of activities you engage in, day to day. This choice lies at the center of everything it means to exist, and to be human. Which fork of the dilemma you choose, is therefore, the most important choice you will ever make.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ title: "The Struggle Between Public and Private"
|
|||
date: 2019-06-09T23:42:44Z
|
||||
series: "1. Main Feed"
|
||||
image: img/1295493-1560114663356-3cd272cfb7e3f.jpg
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-17_c2676aeb7b7eb0e7b4993fdc00899ef0.m4a
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-17_c2676aeb7b7eb0e7b4993fdc00899ef0.mp3
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-17_c2676aeb7b7eb0e7b4993fdc00899ef0.m4a" >}}
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-17_c2676aeb7b7eb0e7b4993fdc00899ef0.mp3" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
Full Transcript {{< reltab title="can be found here." url="post/the-struggle-between-public-and-private/" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ title: "Plato, Parmenides, and the Theory of Forms"
|
|||
date: 2020-10-06T21:12:55Z
|
||||
series: "Plato 101"
|
||||
image: img/1295493-1602021574273-4e224039c4235.jpg
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-10-06_867b86fbd34ba9bd87dd8d13376bd27b.m4a
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-10-06_867b86fbd34ba9bd87dd8d13376bd27b.mp3
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-10-06_867b86fbd34ba9bd87dd8d13376bd27b.m4a" >}}
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-10-06_867b86fbd34ba9bd87dd8d13376bd27b.mp3" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
In this podcast, I will be outlining the theory of Forms, beginning with why Plato might have concocted the theory in the first place, moving next to what exactly the theory is and how it works, and finishing up with an analysis of the criticisms of the Forms offered by Parmenides (primarily), and a few others since.;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ title: "The Allegory of the Cave: What It Is, and What It Means"
|
|||
date: 2019-03-03T23:56:43Z
|
||||
series: "1. Main Feed"
|
||||
image: img/1295493-1585600222453-c49dc61d34e3.jpg
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-14_ddc9c314bfb1765b223a935cf80471a7.m4a
|
||||
enclosure: audio/podcast_2020-02-14_ddc9c314bfb1765b223a935cf80471a7.mp3
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-14_ddc9c314bfb1765b223a935cf80471a7.m4a" >}}
|
||||
{{< audio "https://gmgauthier.us-east-1.linodeobjects.com/podcast/audio/podcast_2020-02-14_ddc9c314bfb1765b223a935cf80471a7.mp3" >}}
|
||||
|
||||
This is the first official episode of the Exiting The Cave Podcast. What better way to kick things off, than with an explication of Plato's Allegory of the Cave?
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue