From 6f40bd02868c1b329d590efd822c3abe0af7de97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Greg Gauthier Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 23:39:44 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] two more 2018 posts --- .../post/a-forgery-of-knowledge-yet-another-academic-hoax.md | 2 ++ content/post/mill-vs-aristotle-the-summum-bonum-that-wasnt.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/post/a-forgery-of-knowledge-yet-another-academic-hoax.md b/content/post/a-forgery-of-knowledge-yet-another-academic-hoax.md index ed5694a..5240615 100644 --- a/content/post/a-forgery-of-knowledge-yet-another-academic-hoax.md +++ b/content/post/a-forgery-of-knowledge-yet-another-academic-hoax.md @@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ They didn’t do that. Instead, they spent a year engaging in “pwnage” for i This is not to say that there are not bad actors in the disciplines they were criticizing. I believe there are, and I believe they do have political ends that go far beyond the scope of what a university’s mission should be, and I believe their actions — engaging in political activism via disingenuous scholarship — is incredibly dangerous and damaging to society. But this is a different question, and requires a different kind of criticism than what went on here. What we need, is another Allan Bloom. Not another Alan Sokal. +```[Imported from exitingthecave.com on 29 November 2021]``` + [^1]: [Academic Grievance Studies and the Corruption of Scholarship](https://areomagazine.com/2018/10/02/academic-grievance-studies-and-the-corruption-of-scholarship/) [^2]: [The Conceptual Penis](https://www.skeptic.com/downloads/conceptual-penis/23311886.2017.1330439.pdf) [^3]: [Huffington Post, “There Are Far More Title IX Investigations Of Colleges Than Most People Know”](https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/title-ix-investigations-sexual-harassment_us_575f4b0ee4b053d433061b3d?guccounter=1&guce_referrer_us=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5odWZmaW5ndG9ucG9zdC5jby51ay8&guce_referrer_cs=K_NU7r1gsA603M54Ry7p3w) diff --git a/content/post/mill-vs-aristotle-the-summum-bonum-that-wasnt.md b/content/post/mill-vs-aristotle-the-summum-bonum-that-wasnt.md index c486736..5039354 100644 --- a/content/post/mill-vs-aristotle-the-summum-bonum-that-wasnt.md +++ b/content/post/mill-vs-aristotle-the-summum-bonum-that-wasnt.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ date: 2018-11-18T23:20:43Z tags: [] topics: [] image: /img/mill-and-aristotle.jpg -draft: true +draft: false --- In a [previous post](http://philosophy.gmgauthier.com/plato-versus-mill-on-the-pleasure-principle-mill-loses/), I outlined some significant differences between Mill and Plato on the question of Pleasure, that I think are grounded in a misreading of Plato. Here, I present a few differences between Mill and Aristotle on the *summum bonum*, right and wrong action, and pleasure.