MyBlogs
/
personal-blog
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

re-date the homo mensura post

This commit is contained in:
Greg Gauthier 2022-09-04 15:46:53 +01:00
parent 807b620ffb
commit bd8b77bf82
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
content/post/more-exploration-of-social-objects.md
View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ description: Once more, with less feeling...
draft: false
---
## Are Social Objects "*Really* Real"?
### Are Social Objects "*Really* Real"?
There is an intuitive suspicion expressed in common sense, that certain kinds of objects -- namely, objects that seem to be dependent upon social factors -- aren't "*really*, real". The intuition is a skeptical one arising out of a default common sense empiricism. While there may be some nominal understanding or some social agreement about the reality of things like national borders or governments, they're not "*really*, real" in the sense that, say, an airplane, or a boulder, or a dog, are "*really*, real". In contemporary philosophical literature, this distinction is typically understood as an opposition between the realist and antirealist understanding of objects, and is sometimes justified by adding the qualification "social" to the term object. The qualification is correct, but incomplete. This paper will attempt flesh out the notion of a social object, in order to provide a clearer understanding of what is meant by it, and to provide a means by which we might answer the question of whether so-called social objects are in fact, "*really*, real".